Search in Xamin or Browse... |
NGC2808XMM - NGC 2808 XMM-Newton X-Ray Point Source Catalog |
HEASARC Archive |
This table contains some of the results, namely an X-ray source catalog, from XMM-Newton observations of the Galactic globular cluster NGC 2808. The authors use X-ray spectral and variability analysis combined with ultraviolet observations made with the XMM-Newton optical monitor and published data from the Hubble Space Telescope to identify sources associated with the clusters. They compare the results of their observations with estimates from population synthesis models.
Five sources out of 96 X-ray sources detected above 4-sigma significance are likely to be related to NGC 2808. The authors find one quiescent neutron star low-mass X-ray binary candidate in the core of NGC 2808, and propose that the majority of the central sources in NGC 2808 are cataclysmic variables. An estimation leads to 20 +/- 10 cataclysmic variables with luminosity above 4.25 x 1031 erg s-1. Millisecond pulsars could also be present in the core of NGC 2808, and some sources outside the half-mass radius could possibly be linked to the cluster.
NGC 2808 was observed on February 1st 2005, for 41.8 kiloseconds (ks) with the three European Photon Imaging Cameras (EPIC MOS1, MOS2 and pn) on board the XMM-Newton observatory, in imaging mode, using a full frame window and a medium filter.
XMM-Newton observations of the Galactic globular clusters NGC 2808 and NGC 4372 Servillat M., Webb N.A., Barret D. <Astron. Astrophys., 480, 397-407 (2008)> =2008A&A...480..397S
Source_Number
A unique identification number for each XMM-Newton X-ray
source in this table. The 5 sources located within the cluster half-mass
radius are denoted as C1 through C5. while the remaining 91 sources are
denoted as 1 through 92 (omitting 4, which was the confused source near
the cluster core subsequently resolved into 5 4-sigma and 3 other 2.5-sigma
sources).
Name
The NGC 2808 XMM-Newton X-ray source designation, as recommended by
the CDS Dictionary of Nomenclature of Celestial Objects, using the '[SWB2008]
NGC 2808' prefix (Servillat, Webb, Barret (2008), NGC 2808) and the source
number.
RA
The Right Ascension of the XMM-Newton X-ray source in the selected
equinox. This was given in J2000.0 sexagesimal coordinates to an accuracy of
0.01 seconds of time in the original table.
Dec
The Declination of the XMM-Newton X-ray source in the selected
equinox. This was given in J2000.0 sexagesimal coordinates to an accuracy of
0.01 arcseconds in the original table.
LII
The Galactic Longitude of the XMM-Newton X-ray source.
BII
The Galactic Latitude of the XMM-Newton X-ray source.
Error_Radius
The 1-sigma XMM-Newton X-ray source positional error, in arcseconds.
Count_Rate
The net (background- and vignetting-corrected) 0.5-10 keV count rate of the
X-ray source, in ct/s.
Count_Rate_Error
The RMS uncertainty in the X-ray source count rate, in ct/s.
Flux
The unabsorbed X-ray flux of the source in the 0.5 - 10 keV band, calculated
from the count rate, using energy conversion factors (ECFs) in the 0.5 - 10
keV band, in erg/s/cm2. These factors were calculated in each of 3 energy
bands (0.5 - 1.5, 1.5 - 3.0 and 3 - 10 keV) and for each detector by
extracting an on-axis source and generating detector response files for the
source (using rmfgen and arfgen SAS tasks). These response files were used to
create a fake spectrum corresponding to a common model: a power law spectrum
with a power-law photon index Gamma=1.7 (the mean spectrum of the detected
sources) and the absorption NH of the cluster. For NGC 2808, the absorption
of 1.2 x 1021 was calculated from the reddening of optical observations
(Bedin et al. 2000, A&A, 363, 159) with the relation computed by Burstein &
Heiles (1978, Ap. Letts, 19, 69). Finally, ECFs were calculated by dividing
the count rates of the fake spectrum by the model fluxes. The obtained fluxes
were then converted to unabsorbed fluxes. This method gives a reliable
estimation of the ECFs needed for the 3 energy bands. To give an idea of the
errors in these values, by changing the spectral index of the model to Gamma
= 2.0, the fluxes changed by 1.5%, 2%, and 8%, in the energy bands 0.5 - 1.5,
1.5 - 3.0, and 3 - 10 keV, respectively.
Flux_Error
The RMS uncertainty in the unabsorbed 0.5 - 10 keV flux of the X-ray source,
in erg/s/cm2.
Hardness_Ratio_1
The hardness ratio HR1 of the X-ray source, defined as
(B2 - B1)/(B2 + B1), where B2 is the 1.5 - 3.0 keV band counts and B1 is the
0.5 - 1.5 keV band counts.
Hardness_Ratio_2
The hardness ratio HR2 of the X-ray source, defined as
(B2 - B1)/(B2 + B1), where B2 is the 3.0 - 10.0 keV band counts and B1 is the
1.5 - 3.0 keV band counts.