About ROSAT |
ROSAT Home Page | ROSAT Images |
---|
Some of the available WFC filters have a secondary transmission band in the
far-ultraviolet. Although these are much weaker than the primary XUV
bands, problems may arise when observing objects that have a particularly
strong far-UV component in their spectrum. The count
rate detected by the WFC will then be an unresolved mixture of XUV and far-UV
photons. In severe cases the scientific return of the observation
may be compromised.
Observers should ensure that their selected targets do not
fall into this category. For any target the severity of the potential
problem can be assessed by referring to Table 12.1
. This lists predicted count
rates for each filter from an
blackbody source at temperatures of
10000, 20000 and 30000 K. The expected far-UV count rate from a target can
then be estimated by scaling the
count rate for the appropriate
temperature to the actual
value (i.e., by multiplying the value given
in Table 12.1
by
). Note that the UV leak is
largest for the S2 filter; for the other filters the UV leak is
unlikely to be a problem except for the brightest stars.
Temp (K) | 4 Count rate in each filter (counts s ![]() | |||
S1 | S2 | P1 | P2 | |
C/Lexan/B | Be/Lexan | Al/Lexan | Sn/Al | |
10000 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
20000 | ![]() | 0.74 | ![]() | ![]() |
30000 | ![]() | 2.1 | ![]() | ![]() |